WAYS OF TAKING SUSPECT’S EVIDENCE

Abstract

The article is devoted to a procedural order of taking suspect’s evidence. The concept of
evidence recorded in law assumes their taking only when carrying out interrogation, at the
same time, the analysis of criminal procedure norms allows us to assume that evidence can be
taken and as a result of other investigative actions. The possibility of taking suspect’s evidence
as a result of a confrontation, presentation for identification, verification of evidence is
proved; the purposes of their carrying out are defined. Data received during specified investigation
are important for a case and are considered to be evidence. Interrogation is the main
way of taking suspect’s evidence. The confrontation, presentation for identification, verification
of indications can't be carried out without interrogation. The confrontation is carried out
for the purpose of elimination of essential contradictions between evidence of earlier interrogated
participants. The mentioned objective is reached by taking evidence in rotation from
each of the participants. The presentation purpose for identification is identification or distinction
of the identified object with that which is remembered by the identifier. It is impossible
without taking evidence from identifier by means of which identifier reports, on what signs
he identifies this object. Verification of evidence on the spot is also connected with taking evidence
as it starts with the offer to the person, whose evidence is verified, to call a place where
investigation is carried out, to reproduce evidence presented which relate to the environment.