Cyclici ty in the development of historic al sci ence of the xx—xxi centuries

Abstract

The article analyzes the main views of researchers on special feature of the social nature of the
mining population of the Urals, as well as on the history of relations between the authorities and the
Ural workers in the first two ten-year anniversary of the XX century. The main discourse takes place
between the supporters of the view of the Ural working as an integral part of the Russian proletariat,
which had no property and fought primarily for their political rights, and researchers advocating the
opinion procrastinator the nature of the Ural worker. Differences in views between the participants
in the discussion are primarily ideological in nature, specifying a different assessment of the nature,
driving forces and leader of the revolutionary movement in Russia in 1917. The analysis of the
development of historical science in Russia in the XX—XXI centuries has allowed the author to
come to the conclusion that between dorvalsy district, Soviet and modern periods there is not only
cyclic-ness in the formulation of specific research problems, but also the continuity in approaches
to their solution.